- - -

Review by Jeremy Welsch

- - -

One of the cardinal rules of good filmmaking is to not underestimate the intelligence of your audience. There are different levels but it makes you wonder which is the bigger crime: not trusting your audience to figure out a movie on its own without being hit over the head with the answer, or thinking they aren’t smart enough to notice that they could have known the answer if given a way to do so. One of the first lines in Jumper told me all I needed to know about the intentions of the film:

“It didn’t used to be this way. I used to be a regular chump. Like you.”

Great…

David Rice (Hayden Christensen) finds out as a teenager that he has the ability to “jump”, or teleport. His mother left home when he was five and he now lives with his father. After almost drowning one day, he accidentally jumps to a library, then home, then to NYC, then into a bank to steal money. If I am moving too fast for you, don't worry. However long it took you to read that last sentence is about as much time as the movie allows for a back story, so you’re up to speed.

Fast forward to today. David has quite a little racket going for himself. With his newfound ability perfected, he lives in a swank New York apartment bankrolled by jumping in and out of, and robbing, bank vaults. One day he comes home from his latest tryst overseas to be met by a man in his loft. Roland (Samuel L. Jackson) never reveals where he is from but immediately tries to capture and kill him. He’s got a bunch of fancy gadgets that are never explained, but we get the idea they prevent David from being able to jump.

The remainder of the movie is about David running from Roland (who happens to be a Paladin - huh?) and finding out there are other jumpers out there, such as Griffin (Jamie Bell), who possess the same ability as he does. Sometime in the middle we briefly find out that Paladins are an organization bent on destroying all the jumpers. The ‘why’ is never explained, but we are expected to make that… uh, leap and just go along for the ride.

The problem with the ride is that it’s, well, kinda boring. And the last time I checked, action movies aren’t supposed to be. The pacing of the film is fine, I suppose, but the teleporting stuff got old pretty quickly when there wasn’t much substance to be found anywhere else. The concept itself is interesting and I think there is a good movie in there somewhere, but the idea of teleporting became a bit thin. I take that back: the idea of teleportation is pretty cool, but the execution was thin.

I guess there’s a reason Nightcrawler wasn’t a bigger part of X2.

The movie is based on the 1992 novel Jumper by Steven Gould. Before sitting down to write this review, I took a midnight stroll down the Information Superhighway to find out if the book was as much of a mess. I learned that the differences between the movie and the book are pretty substantial. All the stuff they changed from the book is all the stuff that comes across as disconnected in the movie. It makes me wonder why you would take proven material, skin the meat from it and try to dress it up as something different. Guess they should have left well enough alone.

You don’t go to a movie like this for the acting, but it is worth mentioning that Jamie Bell is far and away the best part. If I was a jumper and had a friend who could do the same thing, I’d want him there to hang out with. Sam Jackson is underused and reduced to a bad comic book character. That makes more sense in understanding why he looked like a poor man’s Wesley Snipes from Demolition Man. I will say though, the life-sized cutout of Anakin Skywalker they used in the movie has a lot more mobility than I expected from a piece of cardboard. It was still cardboard though, so don’t expect too much.

This movie was like watching a bad run of episodes of the TV show Lost – too many questions and not enough answers. The difference is that in Lost, at least we know eventually everything will make sense. At least more than it does now. Jumper never will, even if the two sequels planned ever get made. The danger of telling a story over three movies is like telling any story; you have to grab them early.

The movie lives up to its name though, because the story is all over the place.

And there’s the rub.

Film Rating: * 1/2 out of ****

Official [ Movie Site ]

Set as favorite

Bookmark

Email This

Hits: 778

Comments (4)

...

Very good review Jeremy, on a so so film by the sound of things, but glad to hear that Jamie Bell was perhaps the highlight in this as far as acting goes. The premise itself of teleporting certainly does sound like an interestingly sounding movie to see when you think about it. It is true, Doug Liman is certainly hinting by the sound of things, that he's seriously thinking about a sequel(s), and I also read a spoilerish avenue that he's looking at that sounds like the focus wouldn't perhaps be so much on Hayden's character I believe (if my memory serves me that is, lol).

I'm just crossing my fingers that Liman's rumored next Moon Project film with Jake Gyllenhaal, won't be another deja vue like Jumper....

Lost, at least we know eventually everything will make sense. At least more than it does now.

I keep trying to tell myself the same thing as well, LOL....Let's hope!

Like always, great review!

Jan , February 21, 2008

Does any body know what brand of leather jacket jamie bell is wearing in jumper

Does any body know what brand of leather jacket jamie bell is wearing in jumper. Somebody who knows please tell me.

Griffin , February 25, 2008

...

jamie bell appearing, no doubt, was the only thing good that happened in this movie. i heard hayden and rachel were a bore and i agree. but good review, thanx

eUnice , March 02, 2008

...

I read the book, then saw the movie. To anyone who's read the book, and like it, DON'T SEE THE MOVIE!

fanzyh , April 19, 2008

Write comment

Name

Email

Website

Title

Comment

smaller | bigger

Subscribe via email (Registered users only)

Add Comment Preview